Rationale and Aims
It has been increasingly recognised by biologists working in
coastal waters that there is a pressing need to standardise methods
of analysis and move towards developing and managing a control
system ensuring uniformly high quality of data. Reliance on
ecological data in terms of its ability to describe quantitatively
the quality of the ecosystem and any environmental impact thereon,
has been increasing, and the development of Environmental Quality
Standards based on biological determinands has further reinforced
this need.
Standardisation of methodology has been addressed for a number
of years but problems of assurance of data and analysis has only
recently been traced although the problem of error was known for
many years. Sources of error in biological data arise through
sampling (operator error, position fixing, season, sampling method,
equipment), sample processing (methodology, operator error),
identification, (operator error, methodology), and interpretation
(data processing). Sampling and data interpretation are clearly
different from the analytical process but have a major impact on
the quality of information produced and it will be important to
include them in any quality control scheme.
The NMBAQC Scheme aims to improve and maintain the standard of
marine biological data being generated to assess the status of
marine waters in the UK and the North East Atlantic. Through the
provision of quality control exercises, training exercises,
workshops, and information exchange it is hoped that marine
biological laboratories can share and develop expertise. The Scheme
does not aim to 'police' marine biological assessment, rather to
facilitate improvements in assessment. While the aim of
the Scheme is to quality assure biological data it is not a
laboratory accreditation scheme. Labs are strongly
encouraged to sign up to appropriate accreditation schemes in
addition to participation with the NMBAQC scheme.
The scheme aims to benefit the competent monitoring authorities
(e.g. EA, SEPA, NIEA, CEFAS, Marine Scotland-Science, AFBI, JNCC)
as a whole by providing quality assurance for marine biological
data being produced by the authorities, or data produced for the
authorities by contractors or licensees. The quality assurance is
based on independent selection of samples for audit. A value added
part of the scheme is the detailed comparative reporting of the AQC
process which along with the training exercises and workshops
contributes towards development of best practice. The scheme should
not be viewed as a sample auditing service for individual CMA
participants, or contractors.
In order to meet the quality assurance objectives, scheme
standards have been set for samples collected for the UK National
Marine Monitoring Programme (NMMP). Data for the NMMP (now called
CSEMP - see History of the Scheme) is
submitted to the UK MERMAN database (http://www.bodc.ac.uk/projects/uk/merman/).
Performance targets have been introduced for samples submitted
within the Benthic Invertebrate and Particle Size components.
Invertebrate or Particle Size samples which fail to achieve
acceptable quality remain flagged along with additional associated
samples from the same analytical lab. for the corresponding year.
Remedial action is required for failing samples (and associated
replicates), according to set guidelines and once this has been
completed the sample flags can be removed. It would be appropriate
to utilise similar standards for Invertebrate samples collected for
other programmes such as the European Water framework Directive
(WFD). It is proposed to develop AQC auditing exercises and
pass/fail standards for samples submitted within the Epibiota,
Macroalgae, Phytoplankton and Fish components. As the specific
methodological problems within each component are quite different
then the format of sample auditing exercises may vary but the
underlying requirement to provide some sort of quality assessment
relating to data from real samples remains the same.
For further information about the rational and aims of
the NMBAQC scheme, please see:
O'Reilly, M. (2009). The NMBAQC Scheme -
Friend or Foe to the Benthic Ecologist. Porcupine Marine
Natural History Society Newsletter, No.25, Winter 2008/09,
9-13.
O'Reilly, M. (2010). The NMBAQC Scheme -
Setting the Record Straight. Porcupine Marine Natural History
Society Newsletter, No.27, Winter 2009/10, 4pp.